As you know, the Clean Air Act was passed by the U.S. Congress and
signed by the president. (It was
originally enacted and then signed by President Richard Nixon in 1970, and
amended in 1977 and 1990.) In 2007, the
U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the authority, under the Clean Air Act, to regulate
carbon dioxide as a pollutant. Therefore, curbs on carbon dioxide emissions
are, in effect, mandated.
A few weeks ago, The Charleston Daily Mail (in West Virginia)
published an editorial concerning support for regulation of power-plant
emissions which was surprising – given that The Daily Mail is in a major coal
producing region. Also, The Houston Chronicle – a newspaper in an oil and gas
state – editorially supported the regulation of carbon dioxide emissions.
Recently, in testimony before a U.S. Senate Sub-committee, four
former Republican heads of the EPA, supported such regulations. In addition, on
June 21, in The New York Times, former Secretary of Treasury Henry Paulson, a
Republican, called for a tax on carbon dioxide emissions.
In a nationwide poll conducted in June by ABC News and The
Washington Post, 70% of the respondents reported "the federal government
should limit the release of greenhouse gases from existing power plants in an
effort to reduce global warming."
These developments suggest that nationally the mood of citizens is
changing in response to events in their lives and research reports by climate
scientists worldwide.
The changes now under way may not proceed as smoothly as we would
like, but increased use of alternative sources of energy and energy conservation are
crucial to our economy, our health, and our survival.
No comments:
Post a Comment